<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Devtools on VisorCraft News</title><link>https://www.visorcraft.com/news/tags/devtools/</link><description>Recent content in Devtools on VisorCraft News</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.visorcraft.com/news/tags/devtools/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Mongrel vs TablePlus: A Focused Database Client or a Broader Workbench</title><link>https://www.visorcraft.com/news/2026/08/mongrel-vs-tableplus-broader-database-workbench/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://www.visorcraft.com/news/2026/08/mongrel-vs-tableplus-broader-database-workbench/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="two-models-for-database-access"&gt;Two Models for Database Access&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TablePlus and Mongrel represent two different theories of what a database tool should be. TablePlus has built its reputation on doing database access with precision and restraint, a focused interface that knows what it is and stays within those boundaries. Mongrel takes a broader view, treating database work as one surface within a larger operational environment where engineers also need terminal access, file transfers, container management, API testing, and a way to move between all of those surfaces without losing context. Neither model is universally correct. The question is which one fits the actual shape of your work, and that answer depends on understanding what each tool is built to handle versus what your daily workflows actually require.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>