<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Forks on VisorCraft News</title><link>https://www.visorcraft.com/news/tags/forks/</link><description>Recent content in Forks on VisorCraft News</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.visorcraft.com/news/tags/forks/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Why We Forked cxx-qt, SABnzbd, OpenRazer, and tail-tray</title><link>https://www.visorcraft.com/news/2026/09/why-we-forked-cxx-qt-sabnzbd-openrazer-and-tail-tray/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://www.visorcraft.com/news/2026/09/why-we-forked-cxx-qt-sabnzbd-openrazer-and-tail-tray/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Somewhere along the way the word fork picked up a hostile ring, as if clicking that button were the opening move in a community schism instead of the cheapest way to make a dependency do one thing differently, and the folklore costs real time, because teams that need a one-line fix will contort themselves with wrapper layers, patch scripts, and vendored tarballs rather than be seen maintaining a fork, when the fork was the honest tool for the job from the start. Four of the repos under the visorcraft organization are forks of other people&amp;rsquo;s projects, none of them are hostile, and each one has a different relationship to its upstream, which is the part worth writing down, because the interesting question was never &amp;ldquo;should you fork&amp;rdquo; but &amp;ldquo;what do you do with the fork six months later.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>