<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Windows on VisorCraft News</title><link>https://www.visorcraft.com/news/tags/windows/</link><description>Recent content in Windows on VisorCraft News</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.visorcraft.com/news/tags/windows/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Mongrel vs MobaXterm: Remote Sessions Meet Databases and Clusters</title><link>https://www.visorcraft.com/news/2026/08/mongrel-vs-mobaxterm-remote-systems-workbench/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://www.visorcraft.com/news/2026/08/mongrel-vs-mobaxterm-remote-systems-workbench/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When a team needs to manage remote servers on Windows, &lt;a href="https://mobaxterm.mobatek.net/"&gt;MobaXterm&lt;/a&gt; is a well-established name. Its portable executable, embedded X server, and broad protocol coverage have made it a staple in Windows-only shops for years. Mongrel takes a different approach by design. Rather than offering the widest possible surface of remote-access protocols, it builds a single workbench that keeps remote shells, database queries, container orchestration, API testing, and safety controls under one interface, and it runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows. MobaXterm&amp;rsquo;s remote-protocol strengths remain clear; Mongrel&amp;rsquo;s case is the additional operational workflow used by database engineers, backend developers, and platform teams.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>